The Science Of Scientific Writing    Set 1     Set 1-Argument Parts : Second Page : Third Page :Fourth Page :Example : Exercise 1 : Exercise 2 : Exercise 3 : Exercise 4 : Exercise 5 : Final Page - Set 1.

Course Home

OVERVIEW: The way to well-written science

How to do the Course

 

PART I: Paragraphs and Sentences...

SET 1: The Parts of Arguments

SET 2: Indicator Words

SET 3: Refining Claims

SET 4: Locating Arguments in Prose

SET 5: Rationale's Essay Planner

SET 6: Assessing

SET 7 : More on Assessing

 

Exercise 3

1. Make TWO Rationale Reasoning maps of this form:

Map Template

Use for FIRST map, these claims:

Drag this onto the workspace

Drag this image onto the workspace to proceed. You must be using the inbuilt browser in Rationale 1.3 or later.

 

 

and for the SECOND map, these claims:

Drag this onto the workspace

Drag this image onto the workspace to proceed.  You must be using the inbuilt browser in Rationale 1.3 or later.

 

 

Finally, drag the image below onto the workspace and inside it type your answer to the question. The image will create a Rationale NOTE box, which can be expanded by dragging its edges. Once it's on the wokspace, just double-click the Note box, and the cursor will appear inside.

If you ever have any other comments or queries you want to add yourself, just create a new note (e.g. by right-click, New, Note) and go for it!

Hints:

  • Identify the positions. It helps to ask: does this box contain the main issue, or is it a claim that suggests we should believe another claim is true or false?
  • Work out which is the upper level objection: this claim directly undermines the position. Turn this claim into a red objection and add it to the map under the position.
  • Work out which is the lower level objection: this claim undermines the other objection.  Turn this claim box into a red objection, and when you connect it under the existing objection it will automatically convert to an orange rebuttal box.
  • The remaining claim must be the reason that supports the upper level objection, that is, a reason for thinking that objection is a good one

2. Check your work against the models.

{

 

Content of this page drawn in whole or part from the Austhink Rationale Exercises with permission from Austhink.