The Science Of Scientific Writing Set 10 Set 10-Assessing again Exercise 1 Exercise 2 Larger maps Exercise 3 Exercise 4 Final. |
|
OVERVIEW: The way to well-written science
PART I: Paragraphs and Sentences SET A: Paragraphs: The Maps Behind Them SET B: Paragraphs: Using Maps to Meet Readers' Expectations SET C: Paragraph Coherence and Cohesion SET D: Sentences SET E: Scientific Sections (including Methods) SET F: Scientific Sections: The Discussion SET G : Scientific Sections: The Introduction SET H : The Paper as a Whole |
Drag this model answer map onto your workspace to reveal an explanation of each step in the evaluation: If you've read Shakespeare's play 'Macbeth' then you should agree that he was respected by others: in Act 1 he is praised several times. If you haven't read the play you should select 'Hmmm' for the main premise, to show you're reserving judgment until more information is available. This would also be an acceptable answer for Exercise 1. We suspend judgment rather than accepting or rejecting the position a single failed objection doesn't tell us anything about how to decide whether the position is good.
Content of this page drawn in whole or part from the Austhink Rationale Exercises with permission from Austhink.
|