The Science Of Scientific Writing    Set 10     Set 10-Assessing againExercise 1Exercise 2Larger mapsExercise 3Exercise 4Final.

Course Home

OVERVIEW: The way to well-written science

How to do the Course

 

PART I: Paragraphs and Sentences

SET A: Paragraphs: The Maps Behind Them

SET B: Paragraphs: Using Maps to Meet Readers' Expectations

SET C: Paragraph Coherence and Cohesion

SET D: Sentences

SET E: Scientific Sections (including Methods)

SET F: Scientific Sections: The Discussion

SET G : Scientific Sections: The Introduction

SET H : The Paper as a Whole


Exercise 2

1. Evaluate this Analysis map:

Macbeth

Drag this image onto the workspace to proceed.  You must be using the inbuilt browser in Rationale 1.3 or later.

Hints

  • First evaluate each of the premises. Ask yourself: Is this true? Should I accept it, reject it, or reserve judgment (Hmmm).
  • Click on each premise's claim box, go to the go to the 'Evaluate' section of the ribbon and click on your assessment
  • Then evaluate the whole objection.  Ask yourself: Does this objection undermine the position?
  • Finally evaluate the position: what confidence do you have in it, given your assessment of the objection?
  • If you rated the objection as 'Nil' stop and think carefully about what this means for the position. Do we have any evidence for making our minds up either way?
  • Make sure you've put evaluation icons in all boxes, as well as coloring the body of the objection itself

2. Check your work against the model.

 

 

Content of this page drawn in whole or part from the Austhink Rationale Exercises with permission from Austhink.