The Science Of Scientific Writing    Set 5     Set 5-EssaysSecond pageThird page Ordering ideasExercise 1Signposting Exercise 2Final.

Course Home

OVERVIEW: The way to well-written science

How to do the Course

 

PART I: Paragraphs and Sentences

SET A: Paragraphs: The Maps Behind Them

SET B: Paragraphs: Using Maps to Meet Readers' Expectations

SET C: Paragraphs with Something Extra: Points and Tails

SET D: The Generic Section: Expectations and Maps as Blueprints

SET E: Scientific Sections: The Methods and Results

SET F: Scientific Sections: The Discussion

SET G : Scientific Sections: The Introduction

SET H : Sentences

SET I : The Paper as a Whole

 

 

PART II: The Paper and its Sections

Introduction

SET 1: Argument Parts

SET 2: Indicator Words

SET 3: Refining Claims

SET 4: Locating Arguments in Prose

SET 5: Rationale's Essay Planner

SET 6: Evidence in Arguments: Basis Boxes

SET 7: Assessing

SET 8: More on Assessing

SET 9: Analysis Maps

SET 10: Assessing Again

Synthesis 1: Position-Early Paragraphs

Synthesis 2: Position-Final Paragraphs

Synthesis 3: Writing a Discussion I

Synthesis 4: Writing a Discussion II

 

There is no one correct answer, but all good answers will have these things in common:

  • An introduction that tells the reader that three main reasons will be considered

  • Use of reason indicators in the body of the essay

  • Use of signposts in the body to direct the reader

  • Use of a position indicator in the conclusion

  • Sensible connecting words and phrases throughout, which flesh the essay out without distracting the reader

Hopefully you had something like this:

In this essay I will be drawing upon the events of the novel, Frankenstein, by Mary Shelley, to argue the case that the main character, Dr Victor Frankenstein, shows less humanity than the monster he creates.

The evidence for this claim comes from both the behaviour of the monster and the behaviour of Frankenstein himself.

From the monster's side, his humanity is shown by a need for companionship and a capacity for empathy. As evidence of his wish for companionship, we see that he wants to be part of the family he observes. Also, another behaviour that indicates his wish for companionship is that he wants Frankenstein to make him a mate. As evidence of his empathy, we see that he stops stealing from the family he meets in the forest, giving them wood instead. Further, he empathises with the young man's companion.

On the other hand, Frankenstein acts in a number of ways that indicate a lack of humanity. At the start of the novel, Frankenstein shuns other people and is obsessed by creating the monster. Then, after he succeeds, Frankenstein does not care for his own creation. We know this, first, because he is horrified by the monster's appearance and second, because he abandons the monster.

Above I have shown how, in Mary Shelley's novel Frankenstein, the monster and Frankenstein have highly contrasting relationships with other people, and with each other. These behaviours, when compared, prove that Dr Frankenstein shows less humanity than the monster he creates.

 

 

 

Content of this page drawn in whole or part from the Austhink Rationale Exercises with permission from Austhink.