The Science Of Scientific Writing Set 9 Set 9-Analysis maps Second page Example Exercise 1 Exercise 2 Exercise 3 Exercise 4 Exercise 5 Refinement Revisited Rabbit Rule Holding Hands Rule Exercise 6 Inference objections Exercise 7 Exercise 8 Final. |
|
OVERVIEW: The way to well-written science
PART I: Paragraphs and Sentences SET A: Paragraphs: The Maps Behind Them SET B: Paragraphs: Using Maps to Meet Readers' Expectations SET C: Paragraphs with Something Extra: Points and Tails SET D: The Generic Section: Expectations and Maps as Blueprints SET E: Scientific Sections: The Methods and Results SET F: Scientific Sections: The Discussion SET G : Scientific Sections: The Introduction SET H : Sentences SET I : The Paper as a Whole
PART II: The Paper and its Sections SET 1: Argument Parts SET 2: Indicator Words SET 4: Locating Arguments in Prose SET 5: Rationale's Essay Planner SET 6: Evidence in Arguments: Basis Boxes Synthesis 1: Position-Early Paragraphs Synthesis 2: Position-Final Paragraphs Synthesis 3: Writing a Discussion I Synthesis 4: Writing a Discussion II |
Did your map look like this?
The objection bears on the assumption, so it needs to be connected to that claim box, rather than the whole reason. Don't map it like this:
This map suggests there is something wrong with the reason other than a problem with one of the claims we've identified.
Content of this page drawn in whole or part from the Austhink Rationale Exercises with permission from Austhink.
|