The Science Of Scientific Writing Set 9 Set 9-Analysis maps Second page Example Exercise 1 Exercise 2 Exercise 3 Exercise 4 Exercise 5 Refinement Revisited Rabbit Rule Holding Hands Rule Exercise 6 Inference objections Exercise 7 Exercise 8 Final. |
|
OVERVIEW: The way to well-written science
PART I: Paragraphs and Sentences SET A: Paragraphs: The Maps Behind Them SET B: Paragraphs: Using Maps to Meet Readers' Expectations SET C: Paragraphs with Something Extra: Points and Tails SET D: The Generic Section: Expectations and Maps as Blueprints SET E: Scientific Sections: The Methods and Results SET F: Scientific Sections: The Discussion SET G : Scientific Sections: The Introduction SET H : Sentences SET I : The Paper as a Whole
PART II: The Paper and its Sections SET 1: Argument Parts SET 2: Indicator Words SET 4: Locating Arguments in Prose SET 5: Rationale's Essay Planner SET 6: Evidence in Arguments: Basis Boxes Synthesis 1: Position-Early Paragraphs Synthesis 2: Position-Final Paragraphs Synthesis 3: Writing a Discussion I Synthesis 4: Writing a Discussion II |
Here's a portion of the smoking map from Set 7:
When we evaluated this we decided that what John enjoys isn't relevant for deciding what you should do, especially if he enjoys doing something silly or dangerous. Think about this for a minute: we didn't reject the claim that John enjoys smoking - we decided that it was irrelevant for deciding what you should do. What we actually rejected was an unstated assumption: you should do whatever John enjoys doing. That assumption can be brought into the open using an Analysis map:
This map is more precise because it breaks down the reason into multiple claims, which are called 'premises'. These claims aren't two separate reasons - they work together as part of a single reason.
Content of this page drawn in whole or part from the Austhink Rationale Exercises with permission from Austhink.
|