The Science Of Scientific Writing Set H Location in Sentences Multi-part Sentences Exercise 1 Maps for Sentences Exercise 2 Simple Sentences Final Page . |
|||||||||
OVERVIEW: The way to well-written science
PART I: Paragraphs and Sentences SET A: Paragraphs: The Maps Behind Them SET B: Paragraphs: Using Maps to Meet Readers' Expectations SET C: Paragraphs with Something Extra: Points and Tails SET D: The Generic Section: Expectations and Maps as Blueprints SET E: Scientific Sections: The Methods and Results SET F: Scientific Sections: The Discussion SET G : Scientific Sections: The Introduction SET H : Sentences SET I : The Paper as a Whole
PART II: The Paper and its Sections SET 1: Argument Parts SET 2: Indicator Words SET 4: Locating Arguments in Prose SET 5: Rationale's Essay Planner SET 6: Evidence in Arguments: Basis Boxes Synthesis 1: Position-Early Paragraphs Synthesis 2: Position-Final Paragraphs Synthesis 3: Writing a Discussion I Synthesis 4: Writing a Discussion II |
The importance of Location in multi-part sentences Preamble: What are 'simple' and 'multi-part' sentences? A simple English sentence is composed of a single, independent clause.
A multi-part sentence, as defined in this course, includes those sentences typically defined in English grammar as being "compound" or "complex", that is, in addition to one independent clause they contain:
I will also use "multi-part" to refer to those sentences that contain one or more phrases that have enough "weight" within the sentence to be separated from other parts by a comma ("phrase" is as defined in common English usage, rather than in linguistic theory, and is typically a short sentence part lacking a proper verb.)
A multi-part sentence may contain a mix of all three types of sentence part:
Comparing the impact of the early and final parts of a two-part sentence Compare your reactions to these two sentences, which provide exactly the same content:
With respect to Kumar's "niceness", most people decide that version (a) supports it but version (b) casts it into doubt. This can be explained by the fact that people interpret the early part of a two-part sentence as providing older, "framework" content, with the final part focusing on newer, more important informaton. The information in the final part of the sentence thus acts like its "take-home message".
Comparing the impact of the early, middle and final parts of a three-part sentence Let us start with a two-part sentence:
Most readers will consider that the new, important information concerns the role of geographical isolation in bird evolution (rather than in animals generally). Now let's expand this sentence to three parts:
The majority of readers will now consider that the take-home message concerns the failure of geographical isolation to explain bird evolution. If one wanted to include all the same basic information, but focus on the overall explanatory power of geographical isolation, one could shuflle the order:
In this version, locating the content about bird evolution in the middle of the sentence will, for most readers, decrease its relative importance. The Table below summarises what we have seen so far about multi-part sentences. Note that readers will interpret a sentence that has two or more middle sentences in the same way as that explained for the singular middle part of a three-part sentence.
Using the first part of a multi-part sentence to provide navigational context In the examples above, the context provided by the first part of the sentence is conceptual, but in other cases it can be navigational:
......
|